Hesper LaunchYour first 200 claims free for new MGAs and TPAsMGAs & TPAs: first 200 claims freeApplyAuto | Homeowners | Workers' Comp | Pet
Use Cases / Pet Claims

Pet insurance claims automation for carriers and MGAs

Pet insurance is the fastest-growing P&C niche - and a soft target for vet-bill upcoding, pre-existing condition concealment, treatment-plan inflation, and pet-identity fraud. Hesper AI runs a full investigation on every flagged pet claim in minutes.

Investigation in progress
PET-2026-118204
Canine TPLO surgery · $8,400 exposure
Running
Progress20%
Investigation phases
✓
Vet invoice and procedure-code analysis
Pre-existing condition record check
Treatment necessity vs breed/age norms
Pet identity & enrollment verification
Provider pattern & ring scan
Evidence gathered2 items
PolicyCoverage active since 2024-02-15
InvoiceProcedure code upcoded: TPLO billed, partial repair documented⚠
Risk score
Low signal
28
/ 100

In short

Hesper AI's agents read the vet invoice and clinical notes, match the treatment to the policy's coverage, waiting periods, and exclusions, and check the condition against prior records. Clean pet claims resolve straight through in minutes. Files showing pre-existing-condition concealment or duplicate billing get a full investigation-grade workup instead.

Last updated

01 · Fraud patterns

Common pet insurance fraud schemes

Pet fraud spans individual exaggeration to organized clinic-side billing schemes. Hesper investigates every flagged claim across all four schemes simultaneously.

Est. loss impact
~$130M

Vet bill upcoding & duplicate billing

Procedures billed at higher complexity than performed, duplicate line items across claim submissions, and phantom services. Hesper AI maps procedure codes against documented treatment notes and detects altered invoice line items at the pixel level.

How Hesper detects it
Procedure-code vs notes matchLine-item alteration detectionDuplicate billing across claimsProvider benchmarking
!
Est. loss impact
~$110M

Pre-existing condition concealment

Owners enroll pets with known conditions and claim for them as if newly diagnosed. Hesper AI pulls and cross-references prior vet records, OSINT signals, and registry data to surface symptoms or treatments that predate policy effective dates.

How Hesper detects it
Multi-clinic record syncSymptom timeline reconstructionSocial-media OSINTEnrollment-vs-history gap
Est. loss impact
~$70M

Treatment-plan inflation

Treatment durations, medication courses, and rehab protocols inflated beyond accepted veterinary standards. Hesper AI benchmarks prescribed treatment against ACVS, ACVIM, and AAHA guidelines for the breed, age, and condition.

How Hesper detects it
ACVS/ACVIM benchmark checkBreed/age-normed protocolsMedication-dosage validationRehab-duration analysis
Est. loss impact
~$40M

Pet identity & breed misrepresentation

Wrong pet covered under the policy, or breed altered at enrollment to dodge premium loading on breed-specific conditions. Hesper AI verifies microchip IDs across enrollment, claim, and clinic records, and validates breed via DNA registry where available.

How Hesper detects it
Microchip cross-verificationPhoto identity matchBreed registry lookupEnrollment-doc forensics
02 · Timeline compression

Manual workflow vs. Hesper

Every phase compresses. The cumulative effect is the difference between a two-week medical-record chase and a decision in minutes.

Investigation phase
Manual workflow
Hesper AI
Vet invoice forensics
Adjuster + SIU review, 2-4 days
Automated
Pre-existing record pull
Multi-clinic records request, 5-7 days
API lookup, real time
Treatment validation
Adjuster + vet consult, 3-5 days
AI benchmark
Pet identity check
Microchip and registry pulls, 1-2 days
Automated
Report assembly
Adjuster write-up, 4-8 hrs
Auto-generated
Total time
10-14 days
minutes
03 · Investigation flow

How Hesper AI investigates a pet claim

Every pet claim runs through a structured investigation pipeline. Phases run in parallel where dependencies allow.

01

Vet invoice and medical record ingest

Vet invoices, SOAP notes, lab reports, and imaging are analyzed across 200+ fraud signals. Every document is checked for line-item alteration, font rendering anomalies, and procedure-code mismatches against the documented treatment narrative.

Pixel-level invoice forensicsProcedure-code vs SOAP matchLab-report integrity checkEXIF analysis on imaging
02

Pre-existing condition forensic check

Prior vet history is pulled across clinics and cross-referenced with enrollment disclosures. The system reconstructs the symptom timeline and flags any treatment, diagnosis, or owner-reported issue that predates the policy effective date.

Multi-clinic record pullEnrollment-disclosure compareSymptom timeline buildOSINT cross-check
03

Treatment necessity vs veterinary norms

Prescribed treatment is benchmarked against breed, age, and condition-specific guidelines from ACVS, ACVIM, and AAHA. Medication courses, anesthesia protocols, and rehab durations are validated against documented standards.

ACVS/ACVIM benchmarksBreed/age normalizationMedication-dosage checkProcedure-necessity audit
04

Pet identity and enrollment verification

Microchip IDs, photos, and identifying marks are cross-referenced across the enrollment document, claim submission, and clinic records. Breed claims are checked against DNA registry data where available and against the enrollment photo.

Microchip ID matchPhoto biometric matchBreed registry verificationEnrollment-form forensics
05

Provider pattern analysis and report

The treating clinic and any referrals are scored against carrier flagged-provider lists and regional billing-pattern norms. A complete investigation report is generated with evidence packages, timeline, and payment recommendation.

Provider scoringRegional billing benchmarkRing graph analysisSIU-ready output
04 · By the numbers
$0B

North American pet insurance written premium in 2024

7.03 million pets insured

Source: NAPHIA State of the Industry 2025
0%

Year-over-year growth in pet insurance written premium

Up from $4.2B in 2023

Source: NAPHIA State of the Industry 2025
Minutes

Hesper AI investigation time per claim

Hesper internal benchmark. Vs. 1-2 weeks manually

0

Fraud signals per document analyzed

Hesper internal benchmark. Pixel-level plus text-level

05 · Common questions

Pet claims automation, answered

How does AI claims automation work for pet insurance claims?

The agents read the vet invoice and the clinical notes, map each line item to the policy's coverage, waiting periods, and exclusions, check the condition against the pet's prior records, and produce a decision-ready file. Clean claims resolve straight through. Anything ambiguous or flagged reaches a human with the evidence already assembled.

Can AI detect a pre-existing condition an owner did not disclose?

The agents pull and cross-reference records across clinics, then compare diagnosis and treatment dates against the policy's effective date and waiting period. A condition documented before coverage started surfaces with the record and the date that show it, so a denial rests on a cited document rather than an adjuster's recollection.

How does Hesper handle duplicate or upcoded vet billing?

Invoices run through document forensics for alterations, duplicated line items, and the same invoice submitted twice across policies or carriers. Charges are benchmarked against comparable treatment for the species, breed, age, and region, and providers whose billing keeps running above the benchmark surface as a pattern rather than a one-off.

Can a pet MGA handle rising claim volume without adding adjusters?

That is usually why an MGA looks at this. North American pet insurance written premium rose 20.8% in 2024 per NAPHIA, and the claims are small, repetitive, and document-heavy - exactly the shape straight-through resolution handles well. Your team keeps the exceptions, the escalations, and the denial decisions.

How fast does a pet claim get resolved?

Minutes for a clean claim, and still minutes rather than weeks for one that needs a real investigation, because the investigation phases run in parallel instead of one after another. Manual investigation takes 14+ days per case, which is why most flagged pet claims never get more than a quick look.

Does Hesper replace our claims system or our claims team?

Neither. It integrates with your claims system through the API and writes decisions, evidence, and recommended actions back to the file. Adjusters keep decision authority on coverage, payment, and denial. The agents do the reading, matching, verifying, and citing that currently eats the day.

See Hesper investigate your pet claims

We'll run a sample investigation on your real flagged claims and show you the evidence package and report it produces.

Request a demo →Explore other use cases