Hesper LaunchYour first 200 claims free for new MGAs and TPAsMGAs & TPAs: first 200 claims freeApplyAuto | Homeowners | Workers' Comp | Pet
Use Cases / Liability Claims

Liability and bodily injury claims automation

General liability fraud relies on manufactured incidents, professional claimants, and pre-existing condition exploitation. Mapping networks and validating scenes is slow manually. Hesper AI runs a full investigation on every flagged claim in minutes.

Investigation in progress
LIAB-2026-071289
Premises slip-and-fall · $34,200 exposure
Running
Progress20%
Investigation phases
✓
Incident scene photo forensics
Claimant history cross-reference
Witness identity verification
Medical & wage claim validation
Geographic cluster & ring analysis
Evidence gathered2 items
PolicyGL coverage active since 2024-06-01
ScenePhoto metadata predates reported incident by 11 days⚠
Risk score
Low signal
28
/ 100

In short

Hesper AI's agents digest the demand package, read the policy for coverage and limits, reconstruct the incident timeline from records and statements, benchmark the valuation, and flag litigation risk early. Straightforward liability claims resolve straight through, and claims showing medical-mill or attorney-driven inflation patterns get a full investigation-grade workup first.

Last updated

01 · Fraud patterns

Common liability fraud schemes

Liability fraud spans individual exaggeration to organized professional claimants operating across multiple venues. Hesper investigates every flagged claim across all four schemes simultaneously.

Est. loss impact
~$3B

Slip-and-fall staging

Manufactured incidents in retail locations, restaurants, and commercial properties. Hesper AI analyzes scene photos for staging indicators, cross-references the claimant's history for prior similar claims, and verifies witness identities against known fraud ring databases.

How Hesper detects it
Scene photo analysisPrior claim historyWitness verificationStaging indicators
?
Est. loss impact
~$1.8B

Professional claimants

Serial fraudsters filing repeated liability claims across different businesses and locations. Hesper AI maps claimant identities across ISO ClaimSearch and NICB, detects patterns of similar claims filed within geographic clusters, and identifies shared attorneys across cases.

How Hesper detects it
Cross-database matchingGeographic clusterAttorney networkID pattern analysis
Est. loss impact
~$2.2B

Exaggerated damages

Legitimate incidents with inflated medical bills, fabricated lost wages, or overstated property damage. Hesper AI detects altered amounts in medical billing documents, validates treatment timelines against injury severity, and cross-references wage claims with employment records.

How Hesper detects it
Medical bill forensicsWage claim validationTreatment timelineEmployment records
!
Est. loss impact
~$900M

Pre-existing condition exploitation

Attributing pre-existing injuries or conditions to a covered incident. Hesper AI analyzes medical record timelines to detect treatment patterns that predate the incident, identifies inconsistencies between current and historical medical documentation, and flags providers with unusual billing patterns.

How Hesper detects it
Medical history analysisPre-incident detectionProvider billing patternsDiagnosis alignment
02 · Timeline compression

Manual workflow vs. Hesper

Every phase compresses. The cumulative effect is the difference between a multi-week cycle and a decision in minutes.

Investigation phase
Manual workflow
Hesper AI
Scene forensics
Investigator + photographer, 2-3 days
Automated
Claimant history review
ISO ClaimSearch manual, 1 day
Auto cross-ref
Witness verification
Investigator interviews, 2-5 days
Public records match
Medical / wage validation
Peer review + verification, 3-7 days
AI analysis
Report assembly
Investigator write-up, 4-8 hrs
Auto-generated
Total time
14-21 days
minutes
03 · Investigation flow

How Hesper AI investigates a liability claim

Every liability claim runs through a structured investigation pipeline. Phases run in parallel where dependencies allow.

01

Incident scene and document ingest

Incident photos, accident reports, witness statements, medical records, and wage claim documentation are ingested simultaneously. Hesper analyzes each file across 200+ fraud signals at the pixel and text level.

Pixel forensicsMetadata analysisWitness statement parsingDocument authenticity
02

Claimant history and identity check

Claimant identities are verified against ISO ClaimSearch, NICB, and public records. Prior claims history, professional-claimant patterns, and connections across multiple incidents are flagged with citations.

ISO ClaimSearchNICB lookupPrior claim historyIdentity graph
03

Witness and geographic analysis

Named witnesses are verified against public records and prior claim databases. Incident locations are mapped against known fraud clusters - repeat venues, shared addresses, and geographic ring indicators.

Witness verificationGeographic clusterVenue patternRing proximity
04

Medical and wage claim validation

Medical bills are analyzed for altered amounts, pre-existing conditions, and treatment patterns inconsistent with the reported incident. Wage claims are cross-referenced against employment records and published salary data.

Bill forensicsPre-existing detectionWage validationEmployment match
05

Investigation report and recommendation

A complete investigation report is generated with scene findings, identity graph, medical analysis, and a denial or settlement recommendation. Output is SIU-ready and defensible in litigation.

Scene findingsIdentity graphMedical analysisLitigation-ready output
04 · By the numbers
$0B

Costs and compensation paid into the US tort system in 2022

Over $4,200 per US household

Source: US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
0%

Average annual growth in US tort costs, 2016 to 2022

Faster than inflation over the same period

Source: US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform
Minutes

Hesper AI investigation time per claim

Hesper internal benchmark. Vs. 14+ days manually

0

Fraud signals analyzed per document

Hesper internal benchmark. Pixel-level plus text-level

05 · Common questions

Liability claims automation, answered

How does AI claims automation handle a liability demand package?

The agents read the whole demand - medical bills, records, wage loss, the letter itself - extract every line item, check the treatment against the documented injury, benchmark the valuation against comparable claims, and draft a response. Time-limited demands are flagged the moment they land, so the response deadline does not slip.

Can AI spot a medical mill or attorney-driven claim inflation?

Network analysis is built into the platform. The agents map which providers, clinics, imaging centers, and attorneys keep appearing together across unrelated claims, then compare treatment patterns and billing against the documented injury. A provider whose claims all follow the same treatment script shows up as a pattern, not as one adjuster's hunch.

How does Hesper flag litigation risk before a claim becomes a lawsuit?

Litigation scoring runs at triage alongside severity and fraud scoring, and it keeps updating as the file develops - representation appearing early, treatment escalating without a matching injury, a demand arriving faster than the medical record supports. Each flag carries its reasoning, so claims legal can act on it rather than re-derive it.

Can Hesper verify witnesses and reconstruct a premises liability incident?

Yes. The agents verify claimant and witness identities against public records, cross-reference statements for inconsistencies, run scene photos through pixel and metadata forensics, and rebuild the incident timeline from the documents on file. Every inconsistency is cited back to the source it came from.

Does Hesper replace our defense counsel or our adjusters?

No. The agents do the legwork - collecting, verifying, reconstructing, and citing. Settlement authority, negotiation, and the decision to litigate stay with your adjusters and your counsel. What changes is that they open a file that is already evidence-backed instead of building the record themselves.

How does Hesper fit with our existing claims system?

It integrates with the claims system of record through the API - Guidewire, Duck Creek, Majesco, or another - and writes evidence, valuations, and recommended actions back to the file. No rip and replace. Hesper can pick up a liability claim at first notice, or mid-stream for demand review or recovery screening.

See Hesper investigate your liability claims

We'll run a sample investigation on your real flagged claims and show you the evidence package and report it produces.

Request a demo →Explore other use cases