Hesper LaunchYour first 200 claims free for new MGAs and TPAsMGAs & TPAs: first 200 claims freeApplyAuto | Homeowners | Workers' Comp | Pet
Use Cases / Property Claims

Property claims automation, with fraud investigation built in

Property fraud - staged damage, inflated repairs, arson, weather exploitation - costs insurers billions annually. Most carriers can't investigate every flag. Hesper AI runs a full investigation on every claim in minutes.

Investigation in progress
PROP-2026-112040
Residential water damage · $62,800 exposure
Running
Progress20%
Investigation phases
✓
Damage photo pixel-level analysis
Weather & satellite correlation
Repair estimate forensics
Policy & loss history check
Ring & contractor network scan
Evidence gathered2 items
PolicyCoverage active since 2023-11-04
PhotoDamage shows pre-existing water staining under 'new' damage⚠
Risk score
Low signal
28
/ 100

In short

Hesper AI's agents read the policy and its endorsements, extract the loss facts from photos, estimates, and reports, correlate damage against weather and satellite data, and quantify the claim. Clean property claims resolve straight through. Files with occupancy, contractor, or fabricated-damage flags get a full investigation-grade workup before any payment is authorized.

Last updated

01 · Fraud patterns

Common property fraud schemes

Property fraud spans individual exaggeration to organized rings exploiting catastrophe events. Hesper investigates every flagged claim across all four schemes simultaneously.

Est. loss impact
~$12B

Staged or fabricated damage

Claimants damage their own property or fabricate losses entirely. Hesper AI analyzes damage photos for pixel manipulation, metadata inconsistencies, and AI-generated imagery, then cross-references scene evidence with weather data and incident reports.

How Hesper detects it
Photo manipulation detectionMetadata timestamp analysisAI-generated image detectionScene inconsistency
Est. loss impact
~$8B

Inflated repair costs

Legitimate damage with inflated contractor estimates. Hesper AI validates repair documents for altered amounts, detects font rendering inconsistencies in estimates, and cross-references costs against regional pricing databases and OEM material costs.

How Hesper detects it
Document alterationFont anomaly analysisCost benchmarkingMaterial verification
!
Est. loss impact
~$2B

Arson indicators

Fires set intentionally to collect insurance payouts. Hesper AI investigates financial stress indicators, prior claim patterns, policy changes before the loss, insurance-to-value anomalies, and connections to known arson-for-profit rings.

How Hesper detects it
Financial stress analysisPolicy change timelineNetwork ring detectionLoss history patterns
Est. loss impact
~$5B

Weather event exploitation

Pre-existing damage attributed to a covered weather event. Hesper AI cross-references claim dates with actual NOAA weather data, analyzes satellite imagery timelines, and detects inconsistencies between reported and actual storm paths.

How Hesper detects it
NOAA weather correlationSatellite imagery timelineStorm path verificationPre-existing damage detection
02 · Timeline compression

Manual workflow vs. Hesper

Every phase compresses. The cumulative effect is the difference between a two-week cycle and a decision in minutes.

Investigation phase
Manual workflow
Hesper AI
Damage photo forensics
Inspector + SIU review, 3-5 days
Automated
Weather verification
Manual NOAA query, 2-4 hrs
API lookup, real time
Contractor estimate review
Adjuster review, 1-2 days
AI analysis
Prior claims / ring check
ISO ClaimSearch manual pulls, 1 day
Automated
Report assembly
Adjuster write-up, 4-8 hrs
Auto-generated
Total time
14-21 days
minutes
03 · Investigation flow

How Hesper AI investigates a property claim

Every property claim runs through a structured investigation pipeline. Phases run in parallel where dependencies allow.

01

Damage photo and document ingest

Damage photos, contractor estimates, inspection reports, and proof of ownership are analyzed across 200+ fraud signals. Every image is evaluated at the pixel level for manipulation, AI generation, and metadata inconsistencies.

Pixel-level forensicsEXIF analysisAI-generation detectionPDF structure inspection
02

Weather and satellite correlation

Loss dates are cross-referenced against NOAA weather records, Storm Prediction Center data, and historical satellite imagery. The system flags claims where the reported event is not substantiated by independent weather data.

NOAA cross-referenceSatellite timelineStorm path analysisEvent substantiation
03

Repair estimate validation

Contractor estimates are analyzed for line-item alterations, font rendering mismatches, cost inflations vs regional benchmarks, and material pricing against current OEM data. Contractors are cross-referenced against the carrier's flagged-vendor list.

Cost benchmarkingFont anomaly detectionLine-item forensicsVendor verification
04

Policy history and ring analysis

Prior claims, policy changes near the loss date, and insurance-to-value ratios are evaluated. Claimants, contractors, and adjusters are mapped into a network graph and cross-referenced against known arson-for-profit rings.

Prior claims reviewPolicy timelineRing graph analysisISO ClaimSearch match
05

Investigation report and recommendation

A complete investigation report is generated with weather correlation, photo forensics findings, contractor benchmarks, network diagrams, and a denial or payment recommendation. Output is SIU-ready and litigation-defensible.

Weather correlationPhoto findingsCost analysisSIU-ready output
04 · By the numbers
$0B

Annual US property and casualty insurance fraud losses

2022 study, all P&C lines

Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
0%

Of P&C claims involve some fraud

Share of property-casualty losses

Source: Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
Minutes

Hesper AI investigation time per claim

Hesper internal benchmark. Vs. 14+ days manually

0

Fraud signals per document analyzed

Hesper internal benchmark. Pixel-level plus text-level

05 · Common questions

Property claims automation, answered

How does AI claims automation shorten a property claim cycle?

The average US homeowners claim runs 40.7 days from first notice to final payment, per J.D. Power's 2026 property claims study. Most of that is waiting - for documents, for a coverage read, for an estimate review. Hesper's agents do that work in parallel, so the file reaches a decision-ready state in minutes instead of sitting in a queue.

Can AI read a homeowners policy and its endorsements to confirm coverage?

Yes. Coverage verification is one of the eight lifecycle stages Hesper runs. The agents analyze the full policy form and every endorsement, produce a cited coverage position that points back to the exact language, and draft reservation-of-rights and coverage letters. The coverage decision and the signature stay with your adjuster.

How does Hesper spot inflated repair estimates or contractor collusion?

Repair estimates and invoices are checked for altered line items, duplicated scope, and amounts outside regional benchmarks. The agents also map which contractors, public adjusters, and vendors keep appearing together across unrelated claims, which is how collusion shows up in evidence before it shows up in the loss ratio.

Can Hesper verify that a weather event actually caused the damage?

Damage photos are correlated against weather and satellite records for the reported date and location, and photo metadata is checked for reuse, editing, and AI generation. When the damage pattern does not match the storm that is supposed to have caused it, that discrepancy lands in the evidence file with its sources cited.

How does Hesper help during a CAT surge?

Software attention is not the bottleneck human attention is. Through a surge the agents keep working intake, coverage analysis, and damage quantification at the same rate, so clean claims resolve straight through and your adjusters spend their time on the complex and suspicious files rather than on triage.

What does Hesper produce at the end of a property claim?

An evidence file per claim: an executive summary, the supporting source documents, a reconstructed timeline, the cited coverage position, risk scoring with its rationale, and recommended next actions. It exports as a PDF or through the API into your claims system, and every agent action is logged with its source and timestamp.

See Hesper investigate your property claims

We'll run a sample investigation on your real flagged claims and show you the evidence package and report it produces.

Request a demo →Explore other use cases