Hesper AI

Comparison

Hesper AI vs FRISS

One flags fraud. The other investigates it.

TL;DR

FRISS is a fraud detection platform that scores claims for risk. Hesper AI is a fraud investigation platform that takes flagged claims and investigates them end-to-end. They solve different parts of the same problem - and most carriers need both.

On this page

The core difference: detection vs investigationWhat FRISS does wellThe gap FRISS does not fillHow they work togetherComparison tableWho should use whatFAQ

The core difference: detection vs investigation

FRISS assigns risk scores to incoming claims using rules and predictive models. When a claim scores above a threshold, it gets flagged for the SIU. That is where FRISS stops. Hesper AI picks up where FRISS leaves off - taking those flagged claims and running a full investigation: gathering evidence, cross-referencing statements, analyzing documents, reconstructing timelines, and generating an audit-ready investigation report. FRISS tells you something looks suspicious. Hesper tells you why, with evidence.

What FRISS does well

FRISS is the market leader in fraud detection for P&C insurance. Its strengths are real-time risk scoring at the point of FNOL, integration with major claims management platforms (Guidewire, Duck Creek, Sapiens), a large reference database from its 300+ carrier clients, and configurable rule engines. For carriers that need to identify which claims deserve investigation, FRISS is a proven solution. It has been in the market since 2006 and processes millions of claims annually.

The gap FRISS does not fill

FRISS flags roughly 8-12% of claims as suspicious. The problem is what happens next. A flag is not an investigation. Most carriers can only investigate 25-30% of flagged claims due to SIU capacity constraints - meaning 70%+ of FRISS-flagged claims are never investigated. The flag expires, the claim gets paid, and the fraud goes unresolved. This is not a FRISS problem - it is a workflow problem. FRISS does its job. The investigation step after FRISS is where carriers are losing money.

How they work together

The ideal setup is FRISS for detection and Hesper for investigation. FRISS scores incoming claims and flags the suspicious ones. Hesper automatically picks up those flagged claims and deploys an AI investigation agent for each one. No manual handoff, no SIU bottleneck. Every FRISS-flagged claim gets a full investigation within hours instead of sitting in a queue for weeks. Carriers get the best of both: FRISS's detection accuracy and Hesper's investigation throughput.

Comparison table

DimensionHesper AIFRISS
Primary functionFraud investigation automationFraud detection and risk scoring
What it outputsAudit-ready investigation reports with evidenceRisk scores and fraud flags
Investigation phases15 autonomous phases per claimNone - investigation is manual after flagging
Time per claim2-4 hours (full investigation)Seconds (risk score only)
Evidence gatheringAutomated - NICB, ISO, OSINT, documentsReferences internal data for scoring
Document forensicsPre-OCR pixel-level analysis, 200+ signalsNot included
Statement analysisCross-references all statements for contradictionsNot included
Report generationStructured report with evidence chain and recommendationsDashboard alerts and score explanations
Founded20242006
Pricing modelPlatform fee + per-investigationPlatform fee (volume-based)

Who should use what

Hesper AI

Carriers that need to investigate flagged claims, not just flag them

  • SIU backlog is growing
  • Flagged claims expire uninvestigated
  • Need audit-ready investigation reports
  • Want to investigate 100% of flagged claims

FRISS

Carriers that need better fraud detection and risk scoring at FNOL intake

  • No fraud scoring at intake today
  • Need real-time risk assessment
  • Want configurable detection rules
  • Processing high claim volumes

Both together

Carriers that want the full pipeline - detection through investigation

  • Flag with FRISS, investigate with Hesper
  • Eliminates the gap between detection and resolution
  • Highest ROI on fraud spend

Frequently asked questions

No. Hesper AI and FRISS solve different problems. FRISS detects and flags suspicious claims. Hesper investigates them. Most carriers benefit from using both - FRISS for detection, Hesper for investigation. Hesper integrates with FRISS's output so flagged claims automatically move into investigation.

Yes. Hesper AI has its own detection capabilities (document forensics, behavioral analysis, 200+ fraud signals) and can operate standalone. But if you already have FRISS, Hesper uses its flags as investigation triggers - giving you detection AND investigation in one workflow.

FRISS typically charges a platform fee based on claim volume. Hesper AI charges a platform fee plus per-investigation pricing ($75-150 per claim depending on complexity). The ROI calculation is different because FRISS prevents fraud through detection while Hesper prevents fraud through investigation - recovering money on claims that FRISS already flagged but no one investigated.

Related comparisons

Hesper AI vs Shift TechnologyFRISS alternativesFRISS vs Shift TechnologyWhat is claims triage?What is an SIU?

See Hesper AI investigate a real claim

30-minute live walkthrough. Custom to your claim types.

Request a Demo